SAD moves privilege motion against Jairam, Renuka


Akali Dal on Monday decided to move a privilege motion in Rajya Sabha against two Congress leaders Jairam Ramesh and Renuka Chowdhury for what it termed was misbehaving with its and union minister Harsimrat Kaur Badal.

The party raised the issue of an alleged spat between the Congress leaders and the Food Processing Minister after Rajya Sabha was adjourned on Friday afternoon due to ruckus over AAP MP Bhagwant Mann’s controversial filming of Parliament House.

Sukhdev Singh Dhindsa from the party demanded that the two should apologise for their behaviour or face privilege motion.

A minister, he said, has the right to speak in any House and the permission for the same was strictly between the Chair and minister.

Badal had sought permission of the Chair to speak on Mann’s act, he said and asked “What right do they have to obstruct.” Dhindsa also alleged that the two had misbehaved with Badal outside the House.

As the Congress members including the two in question strongly contested Dhindsa’s remarks, Deputy Chairman P K Kurien said a minister or a member can speak only with the permission of the Chair.

“That day, the Minister stood up requesting she be allowed to speak,” he said, adding the House was in pandemonium at that time.

Kurien, who was in the Chair on Friday, said he first allowed introduction of a private member bills and “so did not allow the minister to speak.”

The Minister, he said, had a valid point to make and if a discussion comes up again, she will be free to express herself.

Kurien said Chairman Hamid Ansari was seized of the matter and if he desired, the concerned parties will be called.

The alleged incident happened soon after Rajya Sabha was adjourned on Friday afternoon over ruckus created by the treasury benches on Mann’s actions.

Anand Sharma (Cong) said the minister has every right to speak in either House of Parliament on a bill or a discussion. But the issue was whether a minister, who is not a member of this House, raise an issue during zero hour, he asked.

“Can a minister who is not a member of this house have the same privileges as other members of the House” and that too “about a person who is a member of the other House,” he asked.