Video of General Bakshi mocking Mahatama Gandhi, freedom fighters goes viral

92

Major General GD Bakshi has been a regular TV face on various channels’ debates more often on Times Now and its flagship show News Hour with Arnab Goswami.

Perceived to be a nationalist, as is often the case with most ex-servicemen, Bakshi has often been criticised for not criticising the Narendra Modi-led NDA government with the same vigour that he would the UPA government.

Also Read | Exclusive: ‘Arun Jaitley told us that NDA’s promise on OROP was only meant to win elections,’ reveals Maj Gen Satbir Singh

Whilst, very few Indians would see any problem in being a patriot or nationalist, it’s often the fake nationalism propagated by the saffron party or its ideological mentor, the RSS, that rational citizens often seem to have problems with.

Gen Bakshi, as his detractors would argue, appears to represent that ideology, which propagates the so-called fake nationalism.
An ideology, which sees nothing wrong in forming an alliance with the PDP despite the latter’s pro-Afzal Guru stance, but is always nimble-footed in declaring JNU students traitors for the same reason.

Gen Bakshi also flies the flag for those right-wing brigade, which detects an element of sedition while praising Afzal Guru, but sees nothing wrong in Nathuram Godse’s act to assassinate the father of the nation, Mahatama Gandhi.

Also Read | Exclusive: Narendra Modi has betrayed the very trust of us soldiers: Army General on OROP

Very touching and humane indeed on the part of Irani. Extraordinary gesture of support from the politicians to a veteran, who served to keep India’s borders safe all his life.

Many may wonder what the likes of Gen Satbir Singh would be making out of this ‘extraordinary gesture.’ The general has been spearheading the ex-servicemen’s movement for the implementation of One Rank One Pension, but he hasn’t quite succeeded in getting the audience with the Prime Minister or the Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar, two of Irani’s closest cabinet colleagues.

In fact, Gen Satbir Singh had told jantakareporter.com how Modi had betrayed the very trust of soldiers, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had ‘lied’ to the nation on OROP and Parrikar wasn’t somebody he could trust.

Coming back to Gen Bakshi, who broke down on a national TV after being overwhelmed by emotion of nationalism.

A video has now surfaced on social media, where the army veteran is seen mocking Mahatama Gandhi and other freedom fighters in a way even members of the Raj in pre-1947 India wouldn’t do so.

In this short clip, General Bakshi is heard saying, “You tell me what contribution did Mahatama Gandhi and Congress party make towards India’s freedom struggle?…. They say they faced lathi-charge (by English rulers), but even my buffalo gets thrashed by canes! (laughter breaks).. (gets agitated) If you have faced lathi-charge, then what will happen to bravehearts such as (Veer) Savarkar?”

The social media users are sharing this video to make a point that Gen Bakshi is allegedly a ‘closet’ RSS supporter.

This comes a day after Gen Bakshi wrote an emotive blog saying that ‘Only soldiers like us are stupid enough to become extreme nationalists.’

(Video courtesy: @GnomeBaba on twitter)

92 COMMENTS

  1. Khilafat Gandhi was a rabid enemy of India. He set the trend that the PANGOLIN British stooges carried on. (PANGOLIN=Periyar-Ambedkar-Nehru-Gandhi-Imported Religions-Communists). They plagiarized the British “Divide to rule” and “Keep the natives subservient” Government of India Act (1935) into the Constitution by adding bits and pieces borrowed from George Orwell’s “Animal Farm” ever since. This Constitution turned the descendants of those who were Hindu prior to 1921 into Third Class citizens and enabled the confiscation of their temples, treasures, lands, educational institutions and religious freedom in 1959. The Constitution formalized the Reservations-Corruption Raj that condemned India to a perpetual State of low intensity civil war in 1949. A civil war that the Pangolins had commenced long before that.

    From a Great Power in 1957, well ahead of Japan, Singapore and most of Europe, that declined the well deserved invitation to be a Permanent Member of the UN Security Council in favour of China after enforcing the truce in Korea between the US and China and establishing the peace in East Africa and North Africa, India is now (UNDP 2015), below Sub Saharan Africa at 135 out of 172 countries in Human and Social Development and 143 out of 172 countries in internal Peace and Stability.

    India has always done well for a few at the expense of the many. Those undeserving but “uplifted” by India’s Constitution, laws, and courts as “to the manor born” thanks to their Karnan, Vipula and Khobragade like Birth Certificates and members of the Politician-Bureaucrat-Judge-Police-Journalist-Crony Kleptocracy who have subverted the resources of the nation to their exclusive pomp, pelf, privilege, pleasure, perversions and perpetuation.

    General Bakshi, and indeed, any Nationalist of Bharatha Varsha could have nothing but hatred for Khilafat Gandhi. It is thanks to him, not fully, but substantially, that India and Pakistan were born on the Wrong side of the British Blanket. Pakistan to a Moslem step mother who thinks she is Arab and India to a Dalit Step Mother who thinks she is Moslem. Jabberlal Neckscrew was an apt mid wife.

    • Hatred for Indians who are not of your caste, religion or creed will lead to anarchy. If you agree to the General’s view and belittle the contribution of all the freedom fighters and then praise those who sided with the British, there can be nothing more anti national than this. It was because of this mutual suspicion and hatred that the country was divided on religious lines. This experiment did not last even 25 years when Pakistan broke into two, Bangla Desh and West Pakistan, and it is on the way to further divisions. If there is even an iota of love for your country men which includes different religions, we need to stop becoming another Pakistan.

        • Pakistan was divided not because of Congress which just aided the process. It was divided because a majority Punjabi community wanted to make decisions for a weaker Bengali community. Congress just aided the process. In strategic terms, in the long run, it may turn out to be a mistake, as large number of poor bengalis from Bangladesh are causing problems in Assam. Jo doosron ke liye gadda karta hai kabhi kabhi wo khud bhi usme gir jaata hai. Take the example of the Tamilian support for Tamils in Sri Lanka. It only resulted in the assasination of Rajiv Gandhi.

      • Don’t blame me for what the Pangolins and their descendants have achieved with India’s grotesque Constituion and “social engineering”.

        • If you think Indian constitution is grotesque, shouldn’t you be going to Pakistan? Or may be find an Island in the Indian Ocean with a coconut tree , few crows and a dog?

          • Your comment is even more grotesque than India’s Constitution. You must be a PANGOLIN? Without the courage to sail under your own name but must hide in the anonymity of a PANGOLIN coward? You can take your advise and stuff it or set an example by being the coconut you are on a desert island.

            I am not a masochist do not approve of the vicious and ugly exploitative nature of the Indian Constitution.

            The Constituent Assembly was not a legitimate representative body. It was elected by suspended provincial legislatures who were elected on the basis of Council of India Act, 1935. Election made was not on the basis of universal suffrage rather on the basis of selected franchise bestowing voting rights on the mere 3% of population of British India, ignoring 55% of population of Princely states. These, long back suspended provincial legislatures “elected” the constituent Assembly which hoodwinked the nation since it neither represent entire 100% population of Princely India and 97% population of British India. The plagiarized constitution was, in fact, copied by Lord Maurice Gwyer, ex-chief justice of Delhi High Court, who accompanied “Bhadwa” Mountbatten. On insistence of these foreigners spineless Nehruddin prevailed upon the Constituent Assembly to ratify it.

            The Constituent Assembly (also known as Ambedkar under Nehru’s hidden whip) plagiarized the Indian Constitution from the Government of India Act (1935), a House of Lords Confection, that set out the British State as it was then, in response to the demand for home rule. The Right Honourable Srinivasa Shastri of the Servants of India Society was give the honorary title Right honourable (he could not be made a Lord) to enable him to represent Indian interests during this exercise. It was under this Act that Rajaji was elected Chief Minister of Madras Presidency. Sir Bhashyam Iyengar (Sir Bosham) wrote the rather grandiose and meaningless preamble that immediately delighted Nehru. Nehru and Ambedkar removed from the Act the notions of Defence, Foreign Policy and maintaining Standards of Propriety that were vested in the Crown Representative (Viceroy) and it seems India lost it forever thereafter. They then replaced the Council of Princes which was intended to provide continuity of culture,religious interests and local nuances and traditions insulated from Majoritarian Demographic Politics with the Rajya Sabha which became a sinecure or rogue’s gallery for political patronage. They then included inequality under law (anathema to a democracy) and exceptions to the rule of law.anathema to a Republic) and the Many Nations Theory (anathema to the notion of a sovereign state) and came up with the monster that threatens Indian existence, the reservations-corruption, dalit-mughal Indian Constitution that resembles George Orwell’s “Animal Farm” (Four legs good, two legs bad” and “all animals are equal but some are more equal than others”) more than any European or other Constitution. Primarily this was all about looting and plundering wealth and subverting the resources of the State for the exclusive pomp, pelf, pleasure, perversions and perpetuation of the new aristocracy that they had created i.e. the Neta-Babu-Cop-Milard-Crony-Kleptocracy and the Castes and Tribes they selected in this pursuit and the Christian, Moslem and Parsi religions that they favoured and protected. They followed through in 1952 by depriving the tribals from their right to free passage and foraging through the Western Ghats, Dandakaranya, and Himalayas which started the Naxalite Movement and North East insurgencies to which they added fuel by de-recognising the matriarchal and matrilineal systems of the North East and the South West along with the mischief of the Hindu Marriage Act, Succession Act and all that followed. The two combined created a vacuum of culture and tradition which in the North East was filled by Christianity and insurgency further accentuated by Nehru’s hand picked ICS Satraps who thought the North East was for their whim, pleasure, plunder and womanizing (rape). Manipur, which was even more cultured than Mysore in 1947 with the oldest written Constitution in the Sub Continent revolted (naturally) and till this day every Manipuri family has one member under ground and under arms. In 1959 they took over the Hindu Temples and Religious Endowment establishments for the loot and plunder of their neo aristocracy including financing Haj Pilgrimages, tormented the traditional priests (their salaries were never raised) and began the tradition of nationalizing and wallowing in other people’s wealth that continues to this day. India is, perhaps, the last surviving Soviet franchise in the World. We even have that Nehru-Gandhi brown nose Pranab Mukherjee who proposed “Retrospective” laws as recently as 2012 lolling in the Rashtra Potty Bhavan. The same year saw Parliament unanimously remove 1948 published newspaper cartoons from Government approved History text books and nationalize 20% of Private education (net of Minority educational institutions) after having dismantled Government primary and secondary education since 1947. India is now (UNDP – 2015) 135 out of 172 countries in Human and Social Development and 143 out of 172 in internal peace and stability. (Before 1947, Mysore, Travancore and Baroda had universal primary education, nutrition and health). Indira Gandhi’s “Secularism” simply means “Not under Holy orders”. This comes from the days when large swathes of property were owned and ruled over by prelates under “holy orders” of the “Holy Roman Empire” while the Christian laity or “serfs” toiled on the land as tax to prosper the Church and the Lords or Barons and Kings who kept order and “defended” the Church. Truly, the educated, the cultured, the law abiding and the upper caste Hindus are the sole disenfrachised excluded from the Constitutional entitlements and protections to deserve the status of Minority, Secular or “Serf”.

            It may be far too late to find the truth after 67 years of the Indian Republic, just as it is to discover and re build competence, integrity, accountability, principles and standards. The disease inflicted on India by the Nehru-Gandhi Ambedkar Constitution seems irreversible. Alarmed by the “Freedom Movement” and still nervous from the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857 that had been spear headed by Brahmins such as Mangal Pande, after the Great War, in 1921, the British began to dismantle what had passed for Hinduism until such time by commencing a canard of lies to discredit Brahmins and exterminate Brahmanism recognizing this to be the soul of “Hinduism”. It assumed particular virulence in the South of India as the sole act of violence against the British was carried out by Vanchinathan Aiyer who assassinated Ashe, the Collector of Tirunelvelli and V.V.S. Aiyar, an associate of Veer Savarkar ans Shri Aurobindo who became a thorn in the British side. The British were able to play on the non Hindu Majority such as Dalits in the South and the resentment of the upper castes to the success of Aiyers in Government service to build a fascist Anti-Brahmin rump. British stooge Patro of the Justice Party (ancestor of the “Dravids”) promulgated an ordinance (GO 613) to discriminate against the Brahmins in all walks of life. Until 1921, only those who adhered to Brahmanical Aryan Law were considered “Hindus”. Hindu is a defunct nationality of many religions adhering to common Aryan law though the name was coined by the Persians to refer to those who lived in the Indus Valley (present day Pakistan) at a time when both Persians and “Hindus” worshiped many common Gods and Goddesses. (The Vedai period that preceded the Avesthan period in Zoroastrian History). To break the back of Hinduism the British started many activities. In the Madras Presidency they coined the word “Dalit” and made them “Hindus in Law”. Recognizing Brahmanism as the soul of Hinduism (until 1921, a Pandit used to be consulted by the Judiciary on Hindu Law) they abolished Hindu Personal Law, In 1923, they took over the Temples, subverting the congregational temple welfare system. The Indian Political Service even infiltrated Sikhism at Sialkot and influenced Kartar Singh and Karag Singh to create the Akali movement and turn Sikhism away from the Hindus and against Hindus and adopt many Islamic beliefs and practices. The Indian Constitution of 1949, that enshrined inequality under law and exceptions to the rule of law and the 1959 law that took over the temples of the erstwhile kingdoms for the plunder and loot of the ruling classes including the funding of churches, madrassas and Haj pilgrimages rather than establishing schools centered on Vedic education and Ayur Veda hospitals for congregational benefit replaced Hinduism with a “secular” Government notion with the approval of the “secular” courts that were driven by”four legs good, two legs bad”, Dalit, Christian, Moslem. and other notions about what Hinduism must be. As a result, while Jallykatt is banned as cruel to animals, Halal is widely celebrated and while Karthikai Deepam is banned, the violence of illegally amplified Aazan continues five times a day.

        • Not respecting the Indian Constitution and the institution created by it such as the Judiciary, the parliament and the Police and armed forces will lead to anarchy and breakdown of civil society. We will become a banana republic like Haiti or Congo. The The Indian constitution was built on the best ideas of civilised society and is considered one of the best though it does have some aspects which tends to favor the powerful over the weaker sections . If you can convince 67 percent of Indians that you have a better constitution you are most welcome till then lets try to be law abiding citizens of this nation.

          • Respect must be earned. It cannot be bestowed. The Constitution deserves no respect at all. It enshrines inequality under law and exceptions to the rule of law. It pampers some castes, tribes and religions while persecuting others. It is a travesty. An ugly and grotesque confection prepared and tampered with by incompetent, clerks who lacked any iota of integrity.

            I am not a masochist do not approve of the vicious and ugly exploitative nature of the Indian Constitution.

            The Constituent Assembly was not a legitimate representative body. It was elected by suspended provincial legislatures who were elected on the basis of Council of India Act, 1935. Election made was not on the basis of universal suffrage rather on the basis of selected franchise bestowing voting rights on the mere 3% of population of British India, ignoring 55% of population of Princely states. These, long back suspended provincial legislatures “elected” the constituent Assembly which hoodwinked the nation since it neither represent entire 100% population of Princely India and 97% population of British India. The plagiarized constitution was, in fact, copied by Lord Maurice Gwyer, ex-chief justice of Delhi High Court, who accompanied “Bhadwa” Mountbatten. On insistence of these foreigners spineless Nehruddin prevailed upon the Constituent Assembly to ratify it.

            The Constituent Assembly (also known as Ambedkar under Nehru’s hidden whip) plagiarized the Indian Constitution from the Government of India Act (1935), a House of Lords Confection, that set out the British State as it was then, in response to the demand for home rule. The Right Honourable Srinivasa Shastri of the Servants of India Society was give the honorary title Right honourable (he could not be made a Lord) to enable him to represent Indian interests during this exercise. It was under this Act that Rajaji was elected Chief Minister of Madras Presidency. Sir Bhashyam Iyengar (Sir Bosham) wrote the rather grandiose and meaningless preamble that immediately delighted Nehru. Nehru and Ambedkar removed from the Act the notions of Defence, Foreign Policy and maintaining Standards of Propriety that were vested in the Crown Representative (Viceroy) and it seems India lost it forever thereafter. They then replaced the Council of Princes which was intended to provide continuity of culture,religious interests and local nuances and traditions insulated from Majoritarian Demographic Politics with the Rajya Sabha which became a sinecure or rogue’s gallery for political patronage. They then included inequality under law (anathema to a democracy) and exceptions to the rule of law.anathema to a Republic) and the Many Nations Theory (anathema to the notion of a sovereign state) and came up with the monster that threatens Indian existence, the reservations-corruption, dalit-mughal Indian Constitution that resembles George Orwell’s “Animal Farm” (Four legs good, two legs bad” and “all animals are equal but some are more equal than others”) more than any European or other Constitution. Primarily this was all about looting and plundering wealth and subverting the resources of the State for the exclusive pomp, pelf, pleasure, perversions and perpetuation of the new aristocracy that they had created i.e. the Neta-Babu-Cop-Milard-Crony-Kleptocracy and the Castes and Tribes they selected in this pursuit and the Christian, Moslem and Parsi religions that they favoured and protected. They followed through in 1952 by depriving the tribals from their right to free passage and foraging through the Western Ghats, Dandakaranya, and Himalayas which started the Naxalite Movement and North East insurgencies to which they added fuel by de-recognising the matriarchal and matrilineal systems of the North East and the South West along with the mischief of the Hindu Marriage Act, Succession Act and all that followed. The two combined created a vacuum of culture and tradition which in the North East was filled by Christianity and insurgency further accentuated by Nehru’s hand picked ICS Satraps who thought the North East was for their whim, pleasure, plunder and womanizing (rape). Manipur, which was even more cultured than Mysore in 1947 with the oldest written Constitution in the Sub Continent revolted (naturally) and till this day every Manipuri family has one member under ground and under arms. In 1959 they took over the Hindu Temples and Religious Endowment establishments for the loot and plunder of their neo aristocracy including financing Haj Pilgrimages, tormented the traditional priests (their salaries were never raised) and began the tradition of nationalizing and wallowing in other people’s wealth that continues to this day. India is, perhaps, the last surviving Soviet franchise in the World. We even have that Nehru-Gandhi brown nose Pranab Mukherjee who proposed “Retrospective” laws as recently as 2012 lolling in the Rashtra Potty Bhavan. The same year saw Parliament unanimously remove 1948 published newspaper cartoons from Government approved History text books and nationalize 20% of Private education (net of Minority educational institutions) after having dismantled Government primary and secondary education since 1947. India is now (UNDP – 2015) 135 out of 172 countries in Human and Social Development and 143 out of 172 in internal peace and stability. (Before 1947, Mysore, Travancore and Baroda had universal primary education, nutrition and health). Indira Gandhi’s “Secularism” simply means “Not under Holy orders”. This comes from the days when large swathes of property were owned and ruled over by prelates under “holy orders” of the “Holy Roman Empire” while the Christian laity or “serfs” toiled on the land as tax to prosper the Church and the Lords or Barons and Kings who kept order and “defended” the Church. Truly, the educated, the cultured, the law abiding and the upper caste Hindus are the sole disenfrachised excluded from the Constitutional entitlements and protections to deserve the status of Minority, Secular or “Serf”.

            It may be far too late to find the truth after 67 years of the Indian Republic, just as it is to discover and re build competence, integrity, accountability, principles and standards. The disease inflicted on India by the Nehru-Gandhi Ambedkar Constitution seems irreversible. Alarmed by the “Freedom Movement” and still nervous from the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857 that had been spear headed by Brahmins such as Mangal Pande, after the Great War, in 1921, the British began to dismantle what had passed for Hinduism until such time by commencing a canard of lies to discredit Brahmins and exterminate Brahmanism recognizing this to be the soul of “Hinduism”. It assumed particular virulence in the South of India as the sole act of violence against the British was carried out by Vanchinathan Aiyer who assassinated Ashe, the Collector of Tirunelvelli and V.V.S. Aiyar, an associate of Veer Savarkar ans Shri Aurobindo who became a thorn in the British side. The British were able to play on the non Hindu Majority such as Dalits in the South and the resentment of the upper castes to the success of Aiyers in Government service to build a fascist Anti-Brahmin rump. British stooge Patro of the Justice Party (ancestor of the “Dravids”) promulgated an ordinance (GO 613) to discriminate against the Brahmins in all walks of life. Until 1921, only those who adhered to Brahmanical Aryan Law were considered “Hindus”. Hindu is a defunct nationality of many religions adhering to common Aryan law though the name was coined by the Persians to refer to those who lived in the Indus Valley (present day Pakistan) at a time when both Persians and “Hindus” worshiped many common Gods and Goddesses. (The Vedai period that preceded the Avesthan period in Zoroastrian History). To break the back of Hinduism the British started many activities. In the Madras Presidency they coined the word “Dalit” and made them “Hindus in Law”. Recognizing Brahmanism as the soul of Hinduism (until 1921, a Pandit used to be consulted by the Judiciary on Hindu Law) they abolished Hindu Personal Law, In 1923, they took over the Temples, subverting the congregational temple welfare system. The Indian Political Service even infiltrated Sikhism at Sialkot and influenced Kartar Singh and Karag Singh to create the Akali movement and turn Sikhism away from the Hindus and against Hindus and adopt many Islamic beliefs and practices. The Indian Constitution of 1949, that enshrined inequality under law and exceptions to the rule of law and the 1959 law that took over the temples of the erstwhile kingdoms for the plunder and loot of the ruling classes including the funding of churches, madrassas and Haj pilgrimages rather than establishing schools centered on Vedic education and Ayur Veda hospitals for congregational benefit replaced Hinduism with a “secular” Government notion with the approval of the “secular” courts that were driven by”four legs good, two legs bad”, Dalit, Christian, Moslem. and other notions about what Hinduism must be. As a result, while Jallykatt is banned as cruel to animals, Halal is widely celebrated and while Karthikai Deepam is banned, the violence of illegally amplified Aazan continues five times a day.

      • Indeed “Hatred for Indians who are not of your caste, religion or creed will lead to anarchy”. These are the words of wisdom which EVERYONE must remember, not just Gen Bakshi and those referred to as Sanghis.

        • Thank you. Therenis no other way.The heart of many BJP and RSS supporter seems to be filled with hate, arrogance and lust of power. Has any one seen any post from them which talks of love and understanding or a spirit of live and let live. What they fail to understand is that a forced victory through brute force or goonda gardi in the name of nationalism and Hindutva will leave many indians resentful and angry. Is Bharat meant to be Mahaan only for a select few. And these select few have only hate and contempt for other Indians. Is this True desh bhakti? Hate and anger consumes and destroys. I would appeal to evry Indian to learn to love and accomodate the differences not see each other through the eyes of ones own identity.

          • You are a PANGOLIN. An enemy of India who believes in inequality under law, exceptions to the rule of law and persecution of some for the benefit of others. At present, the sole purpose of the Indian Republic, Constitutional or otherwise, is to pamper and provide for certain constitutionally preferred sections of society who the British found useful to hold and exploit India at the cost of those who the British hated and persecuted. (PANGOLIN is an acronym for the Periyar-Ambedkar-Nehru-Gandhi-Imported Religions-Communist Consensus that usurped the British Mantle and has worn it with elan to loot, plunder, and rape India since 1921)

        • “Hatred for Indians who are not of your caste, religion or creed will lead to anarchy”. “Four legs good, two legs bad” Is enshrined in India’s Constitution, Laws, and Courts. At present, the sole purpose of the Indian Republic, Constitutional or otherwise, is to pamper and provide for certain constitutionally preferred sections of society who the British found useful to hold and exploit India at the cost of those who the British hated and persecuted.

      • not all armymen my friend, you remember this moron didn’t take part in OROP protest and even criticized them, do you think all who were protesting were anti-nationals? even I am not saying this moron is anti-national unlike this moron saying all other not supporting Modi is anti-Indian.

    • OROP was not a nationality test ! In fact it was a political slug fest ! Good General Bakshi stayed away ! But anybody calling a veteran army personel rabid moron should consult a shrink ! Nobody in the world would fall so low as you cheap congress Trolls who are ok with anti national slogans and activities by anybody who is anti BJP or RSS or a nation being looted by a family for generations…but not army man giving his opinion is horror ?!

    • Gen Bakshi was in the midst of the peak of every action since 1971. he has seen it all, seen a lot of bad blood and he saw too many young boys of army dying in front of his eyes. Shame on those who are mocking him.

      • don’t bring emotional argument to put put weight to your senseless argument.
        It will be bad , be it any person, to say Mahatma did anything.
        Mahatma Gandhi had some content thats why Indians (which includes your forfathers too) gaved him their support.
        Even great personalities like Sardar Vallabh Bhai patel, Bhagat singh and Netaji had respect for Mr.Gandhi .
        As per you they were fools (who witnesses the actual battle of independence)and Mr. Bhkashi is intelligent (who had no idea what were historical situation back then)

        • Do you have comprehension issues? Are you making any sense at all with that argument of yours? What was emotional about my argument there? Point out properly? BTW Zee news has come with a total rebuttal on the claims of doctored video. Go check it.

          • zee news is fools (Bhakts) fairy land, where fools like you get content from. Zee News editor Sudhir chaudahry was caught red handed asking for ransom from Navin Jidnal and you follow such a news channel ?!

            You have proven enough of your stupidity, that it makes no doubt that any one could match your stupidity.

          • You assume too much dont you? I dont follow any news channel blindly. Atleast am well aware of the fact that Barkha Dutt was caught on #RadiTapes . So, please go ahead and live in your etiopia

        • You’re right they had great respect to him but he bacstabed all whom you’ve mentioned and finished their eras for his & neheruddins political gain & titles of Father & chacha ….

  2. I do not approve totally the role of Gandhi and his method of forcing ideas on others in the name of sathyaagraha, non violence and fasting. But I am extremely proud to be an Indian. It does not matter having an idea on freedom fighters and being anti national. I find the difference.

  3. Brain washed minds fed on the myths of Gandhi and Nehru cannot brook criticism. Why not these guys comment on the submissions of Godse before the Khosla comminsion in defence of his action.

    • Godse and his mentor Veer Savarkar wants Hindus and that too of a certain creed to be the dominant power or deciding power. There is no spirit of accomodation. History and the ground reality has shown that a unitary culture will not survive in India. Even the Mughals and the British realised it. We are more than 26 states with 1000 languages. It will lead to a breakup of the country. Most Indians have rejected this ideology especially as it led to the murder of a man who became a Mahatma one of the greatest Indians the whole world has acknowledged. Hate and pride makes a person blind and leads to destruction.

        • Mr. Krishnan
          I wonder why don’t you and Gen bakshi garner courage to speak against Modi ji on his insistence on unveiling statue of Mahatama Gandhi on every one of his foreign trips..
          Both of you must write a petetion against him asking him to stop Glorifying Gandhi instead of MR. Godse else he should face the similar abuses on social media… do you have the guts to do so if you are true to cause.
          Or is Mr. BAKSHI and you trying to say that Modi ji is also anti national and cool as he doesn’t leave any international or national foplatform to praise Gandhi ji.

        • Ishwar Allah tero naam sab ko sammati dey bhagwan. Love and Hate. Sacrifice or Selfishness. Give or Take. Broadminded or Narrowminded. Inclusiveness or exclusiveness. Gandhi and Godse. Being a Leader in a paternalistic manner, Gandhi tried to force Indians like Godse to sacrifice for Muslims whom Godse considered as outsiders, invaders. Most Indians understood what Gandhi was trying to do. Spread love and amity. Godse did not. Hence his hate killed love and an idealistic Gandhi made the ultimate sacrifice.

      • You are NOT a Hindusthani. You are a Pangolin. An enemy of India who believes in inequality under law, exceptions to the rule of law and persecution of some for the benefit of others. At present, the sole purpose of the Indian Republic, Constitutional or otherwise, is to pamper and provide for certain constitutionally preferred sections of society who the British found useful to hold and exploit India at the cost of those who the British hated and persecuted. (PANGOLIN is an acronym for the Periyar-Ambedkar-Nehru-Gandhi-Imported Religions-Communist Consensus that usurped the British Mantle and has worn it with elan to loot, plunder, and rape India since 1921)

        • Damn You are so “Castist” , why are you full of vengeance for Ambedkarites ? If you think they are constitutionally preferred why do you forget that you have forged entire religions to prove that you are the most preferred race caste of people. If you think PANGOLIN as you refer to them wants inequality under law .. why do you forget that you created the inequality and religious reservation first. Before common law religion was the law and you prefer to follow it. If you are so keen on getting it removed would you accept a casteless society ? Would you marry an SC/ST ? If the answer is a NO why dont you just shutup.

          • I see that you have been brain washed by the British-PANGOLIN consensus. I refuse to accept what has now become YOUR lies.

          • You are very much free to live in the little world where you want to believe that Brahmins never persecuted dalits. Sure you can think like that yet you forget to acknowledge the fact that PANGOLIN is not a british creation but it is your own creation by forging castes in religion and it is not a lie please pick up some religious text, caste is very much a part of religion.

          • How very generous of you. Demonstrates the mind and viciousness of your ilk. Caste was invented by the British just as “Hindu” as a “religion” was. This they did by using their toadies such as the PANGOLINs and their descendants.

          • How convenient of you to put the blame on Britishers, this shows the mentality of your ilk. Before refuting your theory i just want to clarify your theory that Britishers invented Caste, Gotra and entire intricacies of putting some people under caste some out of it all alone and forged the religious doctrines them selves ?

          • Britishers are long gone. What they originated continues under the care of their PANGOLIN successors.The Caste System is now a creature of the Indian Republic and its grotesque Constitution that will ensure its perpetuity through the low intensity civil war that it has engendered as envisaged in the Government of India Act (1935) that was plagiarized into a Constitution. I am not into theory. Theory is for those, like yourself, who are struggling to find meaning in the void created by the Indian Republic when the PANGOLIN consensus eradicated History and truth as inconvenient to the Justifications, Laws and Policies that would enable the subversion of National Resources plundered for the pleasure, pomp, pelf, perpetuation and perversions of the neo aristocracy of PANGOLINs. You are steeped in Anglo-PANGOLIN mythology. The religious doctrines attributed to the People of Dharma by the British and the PANGOLINs are their deliberate fantasy and have no relation to fact. For just one example, that charlatan Ambedkar writes copiously on the Manu Smrithi? What are his sources? It is forbidden among the People of Dharma in general and the followers of the religion of Brahmanism in particular to commit the Vedas, the Upanishads, the Sookthas and the Smrithis to writing, for they live in the mouth of the adept.

            The British Pogrom commenced in 1857 of eradicating Brahmanism as the soul and core of Hinduism. The remnants of the Bengal Native Infantry were blown from the cannon’s mouth. Then, based on “ecidence” manufactured and presented to the British by the Moslems, the Brahmins were singled out as the cause of the Mutiny. The reprisals began. Their relatives and every Brahmin man, woman and child who could be found were slaughtered across present day bangla Desh, Bengal, Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh and Uttaranchal (the erstwhile Bengal Presidency). The East of India has never recovered from this genetic and cultural void. This void is now rivaled by the exodus of Brahmins from the South of India to escape the Persecution of the Indian Republic. The British plot found perfect expression in 1921 when the British stooge “Justice Party” they had appointed to rule passed Gazetted Order 613 to persecute Brahmins in all walks of life and confiscated the Commonwealth of Temples, irrigation tanks, grazing and agricultural lands, educational institutions, treasure, and religious freedom of The People of Dharma in 1923 and began to spread canards about Brahmanism to justify their actions rather in the fashion of the National Socialist Party in Germany that persecuted the Jews. They labeleedd the People of Dharma as “Hindu”. They also named those who were neither Din e Kitabi nor People of Dharma as Dalits as Hindus to swamp the congregational temple welfare system and destroy it.

            In 1949 the Periyar-Ambedkar-Nehru-Gandhi-Communist Consensus turned the descendants of those who had been Hindus prior to to 1921 in Third Class Citizens in their Constitution and, in 1959, extended the confiscation of the Brahmin Commonwealth of Temples, irrigation tanks, grazing and agricultural lands, educational institutions, treasure, and religious freedom to the erstwhile Princely States from what remained to them of British India.

            Today Temple Wealth is looted and used to fund Haj pilgrimages for Moslems as well as Trips to Jerusalem for Christians and Jews and the restoration of churches as well as to feather the personal nests of the atheist and other Non “Hindus” with power given to them by Government over the Temples. .

            In 1959, the Indian Republic confiscated all the religious freedoms, temples, educational institutions, common grazing grounds, irrigation tanks, treasure and common wealth of those descended for pre-1921 Hindus. As a result, the traditional, hereditary, law giving priesthood has been effectively eradicated with hardly anybody competent to operate temples. It takes a hereditary (i.e. gentically suited) Brahmin some thirty years in a proper Guru Kula to develop the power to be able to empower a temple as a Yantra. The sole compensation for such prodigious dedication and effort in present day India is humiliation and a stipend that is not enough to feed an ordinary man, let alone one who develops an enormous appetite through regular adhyayana and his family

            So, what the Briritsh wished to accomplish, the PANGOLINs have. Congratulations.

          • Man i am sorry for you u are living in a denial just like the flat Earthers think that earth is flat, you want to live in a shell where you dont want to face reality. But i am surprised people like you do exist in India.

          • I do not feel sorry for myself or mine. We are doing quite well elsewhere thanks to India’s suicide. I do not feel sorry for India either. It has chosen its suicidal path, There are lots of us, but only a few who have been deprived of everything by the Indian Republic already dare to speak out honestly.

          • Go away little man. Find somebody with an intellect your size. It shoud not be difficult after Seventy Years of the Indian Republic. You should find India’s scientific community, judiciary, bureaucracy and so on overflowing with pea sized brains like your own. This is by design.

          • I would agree to your assertion, afterall you are also a product of this education system. I am surprised i dont see as many buffoons like yourself, and most certainly not with illusions of grandeur like yourself. I agree this is by Design.

          • I am not a product of this education system. But a PANGOLIN buffoon like you would want to lower everybody to his level atelast in his mind’s eye. I am educated. You are a PANGOLIN.

          • I am computer Programmer and you …. look like you are some arts guy (definitely not philosophy), may be MBA types or finance. One thing is for sure you are not a rational or scientific minded person. So what ever your education its of no use since you have a bias against other castes. This country would go to dogs if more people like you exist who hates everyone else other that his own kind. So i am rational and you are STUPID.

          • It would take several pages to list out my accomplishments in the many professions, organizations and countries that I have chosen to grace. Suffice it to say that I was Co-Chairman of MAIT (Software and Education), Member (ICT) of the Core Group of FICCI and Advisor to the Government of India (Professor Rajaraman) Committee on Computer education before you were probably born. I was Chairman of the East African Internet Association and Ombudsman for East Africa of the Institute of Economic Affairs and brought the Internet to Africa before India had heard of the Internet. My seminal paper published by the University of Maryland coined the term and concept of “Electronic Commerce”.This would certainly seem stupid to any PANGOLIN because it is beyond any PANGOLIN’s vision or comprehension. As I said, “I am not a product of this education system. But a PANGOLIN buffoon like you would want to lower everybody to his level at least in his mind’s eye. I am educated. You are a PANGOLIN.” Go learn to talk to your computer. That might be far in excess of your competence at this time.

            I have no more time to waste on you. Begone little PANGOLIN

          • Yet nobody ever heard of you , probably the first use of the term e-commerce was introduced by IBM and not Suchindranath. Anyway as i said you are the MBA or business type, busy promoting a technology not Inventing it. Most sane minds in the world dont have a good opinion on business people. They really dont contribute to human society instead they just talk, and talking in my view is neither accomplishment not contribution. As i said you are STUPID.

          • Ha! Ha!

            Try a reading exercise. A small one suitable for a beginner like yourself:

            “I am not a product of this education system. But a PANGOLIN buffoon like you would want to lower everybody to his level atelast in his mind’s eye. I am educated. You are a PANGOLIN.”

            “I am not a product of this education system. But a PANGOLIN buffoon like you would want to lower everybody to his level at least in his mind’s eye. I am educated. You are a PANGOLIN.” Go learn to talk to your computer. That might be far in excess of your competence at this time.

            But for your birth certificate you would probably be doing a bad job of cleaning the toilets in an India which is yet to catch up with Sub Saharan Africa in toilet technology and availability.

            Thank you for giving me an insight into how far India has been culturally, erudition, arithmetic and integrity impoverished with your personal example.

            By the way, try to improve your name calling repertoire which seem too limited for a Pangolin.

            For a Second time, I have no more time to waste on you. Begone little PANGOLIN.

            I conclude this exchange as entirely unproductive.

          • I agree it has been entirely unproductive yet you cannot resist getting sucked into it, that’s your very nature just keep talking i enjoy your illusions of grandeur and it is amusing for me to see a simpleton like yourself.

            I would imagine you consider yourself nothing less than a Nobel laureate. And you are fighting with a menial creature like myself for your existence and ideas. Isnt this an evidence enough to come down to reality, but i guess it would be tough for an old nut like yourself who is still living with 17th century brahmanical superiority complex.

          • Ha! Ha! Ha! Your genetics and your culture are showing.

            For the third and last time, I have no more time to waste on you. Begone little PANGOLIN

          • If you think you are genetically superior get yourself checked, and you say British invented caste, what a hypocrite. You really dont have any sense of intellectual honesty or integrity do you ?

          • One more thing Join Quora, i want to see what other people think of you and your Ideas. You will get a better feedback of your thought process as it is a very nice platform for lot of intellectually inclined and reasonable people. So instead of debating on these obscure channels i suggest you come to Quora.

          • Here’s a small food for thought you do accept that Brahmanism exist in your own admission above and then you go on to blame Britishers and others that sure smells like hypocrisy to me. You talk about Manu smriti and religious text and say the sources are only on peoples tongue ? Do you mean the religious texts like vedas arent documented and printed for others to access ? If that is true then it is another sign attempt of withholding knowledge by Brahmins. And you say british created caste ? You have serious mental issues , your logic is flawed you have written such a big rant but all you have is just confirmation Bias.

          • You are, like India’s Judges, Police, Bureaucrats, Politicians and Journalists, after Seventy Years of the Indian Republic, Erudition, Arithmetic, Integrity, Culture and Integrity challenged. As a result, your agendas intervene with your comprehension.

  4. You are posting a video from a someone called @gnomebaba fro twitter. A quick look would tell you he is on the payrolls of your AAP or leftists.

  5. General Bakshi is a known chaddian who is paid to defend anti national RSS on rumour monger’s channel times now. During war he proved to be back bencher. So many brave army men are fighting for their legitimate right but this sanghi stooge barking on different news channels.

  6. Ofcourse..history me hmesha aise hi show kiya jata hai jaise ki sirf Gandhi ji aur Nehru ya congressis ki wakah se aajadi mili ho jabki is ajadi k liye Shaheedo ne apni jaan di h jaise Chandrashekhar Aajad,Bhagat Singh,Khudiram Bose.Rajguru,Sukhdev,Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose,INA aur kai aise jinke naam bhi nhi btaye jate history me..sabki sacch ye h ki Gandhi ji k movements 42s tak hi kamjor pad chuke the..aur World Wars se huye nuksan aur INA k bad bhartiya soldiers me British Crown k prati km hoti loyalties ki wajah se Britishers darr gaye to aur tb yha kabja rkhna mushkil ho gya..resources bhi bhut lg re the isliye wo gaye aur Ajadi k bad sara credit kisko diya gya..Gandhi aur Nehru ko..jabko inka role kuch jada bhi nhi tha usme ?

  7. This is a fake. The real video of this occasion has G. D. Bakshi talking about Netaji and INA. The picture of Savarkar in the background and the voice are doctored in.

  8. He will make fun of Lord Buddha too. Today, with Twitters and FB accounts people think they are at the top of the world, But during that time, what Gandhiji achieved no one else can ever achieve. He was known throughout the world in times when a letter reaches you home after a month or so. So to compare the circumstances in today’s times with Ballistic missiles is totally unfounded. here would e grave anachronism for such a naive assessment. Veer Savarkar is indeed brave. But how many people in India or outside the country acknowledge what he did? At that moment who else could unite the country apart from Gandhiji? Even the Irish, French and other nationalities supported India’s freedom movement thanks to the charisma of this little unassuming person. His contribution can never be erased. The world will not allow anyone to erase.

    • But the present-day Congress has moved away from the teachings of Gandhiji and its they only who have divided this nation on the basis of caste, region and religion.

      • See my friend. An institution is a long shadow of one man.So we need not relate to the Congress of today, who are decayed remnants of the original ones. However I would even tolerate a corrupt minister to the one who runs a mob in a street openly. Previous;y the Left were seen behaving like that but now the extreme right wing ruling party is behaving in the same manner.

    • The irony of his ahimsa tatva was begging your freedom in your home from infiltrated & forcefully acquired enemy ….instead of fighting & earning your freedom & position on your own house

  9. This idiot “Janta ka Reporter” has some serious doubts. How dare he can have opinion of an army general’s nationalism and patriotism? So far, no political party in India has betrayed the Indian armed forces than the Congress party.

  10. Gen bakshi is right…..Gandhi was only interested in personal glory at expense of Hindus and he manipulated the soft mindedness of Hindus and allowed nation to be divided on religious lines !

  11. Its really sad that now we are comparing freedom fighters. Everyone did their best for the freedom of India.
    Bose, Bhagat Singh etc all were supporters of Gandhi. And Gandhi had the power to unite and entire nation which no one could do.
    Some people belive that only voilence gives results. Therefore they think Gandhi’s methods were nothing.
    But he is the reason why people forgot their differences and stood against the britishers.

  12. Proud of Gen Bakshi and unknown soldiers who gave us freedom. Gandhi didn’t give freedom but has united the country but later also responsible for killings of millions of Hindus. Britishers just used him for timepass.

    • If we do not have facts on our sides, we can create facts to support our ideas. I am glad to know that General Bakshi fought the Britishers and gave us freedom. The brave Indian soldiers fought the 1948 War, 1965 Pakistan War and the 1971 Bangla Desh War under the leadership of the Congress governments which had spear headed the national movement of freedom under Mahatma Gandhi. India become a Nuclear and Space Power under the Congress governments. Any other fact is your imagination misleading you. It was the great freedom fighters from Nagpur and Pune who gave written assurance of cooperation to the British. This is a fact. Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, whose army had people from all castes and religion, gave his life for India. Also did Bhagat Singh and Ashfaqullah. If any of these people would have been alive today, they would not have not accepted or supported such re writing of history.

  13. I am not sure since when criticising Gandhi became no-go zone for Indians or a sign of anti-national? Gandhi had many great virtues, but he also had many vices.
    In reality, MK Gandhi was the son of a rich Chief Minister of Gujarat state of Pordondar in British India, he hardly knew INdia much, just like Nehru. His love for INdia started when he was thrown out of a railway coach in UK, no british women liked that native guy, who used to think himself no less than a Brit, as many Indian ‘elites’ cronies of Brit that time used to think.
    He was a racism, as his dislike for African black people are well known (and also became clearer in a recent unrest in South Africa, as published in Brit newspaper, The Guardian”.
    Gandhi also believed in heinous caste system. There are many such issues.

  14. This is a 15 minute video, for your convenience you have cut the required portions and tarnishing Gen Bakshi’s image. As a reporter, if you have the guts please share the full video. Moreover, we can glorify Gandhi all the time but people who eliminated Netaji from the scenes will not be brought to the front. In the video, Bakshi Saab talks about Indo-Pak war, Bangladesh independence, Indian Independence etc. First thing, Is there any link between Veer Savarkar and RSS. Veer Savarkar started Hindu Mahasabha. Did at any point of time his organisation worked with RSS? Don’t bring stupid doctored videos and don’t corrupt people’s minds.

  15. What’s wrong with you Janta Ka Reporter? You are now wanting us to judge a personality who has served nation for 35 years without even digging deep. Its such shame. If it would have been AAP your reactions would have been completely different…

  16. this moron should join BJP and should become a spokesperson for BJP instead being an independent panelist, I have never seen him criticizing BJP and saying anything neutral on any issue.

  17. Gen Bakshi should either join BJP or he should represent BJP in the Debates, not as a expert, it is really disgusting, any person has his own view, fine, but let them come open, not hiding behind moronic excuse.

  18. The problem is you miss the point and refuse to go through the submission of Godse. The intention behind your tricky suggestion. is obvious- to create rumpus and chaos.

  19. Maj.Gen (Retired) Bakshi is entitled to speak for whoever he wants to in a democratic country like ours…and so are the others like Kanhaiya Kumar…Whether t ex MG.. needs psychiatric help or not is a matter of opinion…!!!
    .

  20. आरएसएस के लोगो से ये 16 प्रश्न आप कीजिये इनके जवाब ये लोग नही दे पायेगे उलटा आप को गाली देगे या ब्लॉक करके भाग जायेगे या विरोधियो का फोटोशॉप पोस्ट डालेगे पर फिर भी आप ये सवाल करते रहे

    (1) आरएसएस ने आज़ादी की लड़ाई क्यों नही लड़ी ?

    (2) आरएसएस हिन्दू हित की बात करता है उसकी वेशभुषा विदेशी क्यों है

    (3) सुभाषचन्द्र बॉस आज़ाद हिन्द सेना का गठन कर रहे थे तब संघ ने सेना में शामिल होने से हिन्दू युवकों को क्यों रोका

    (4) संघ के वीर सावरकर अंग्रेजो से 21 माफ़ी देकर जेल से क्यों छूटे जबकि 436 लोग और थे सेलुलर जेल में सिर्फ इन्होंने ही क्यों माफ़ी नामे लिखे ऐसी क्या विपदा आ गई थी

    (5) आरएसएस के पहले अधिवेशन में 1925 में द्विराष्ट्र सिद्धान्त हिन्दू राष्ट्र और मुस्लिम राष्ट्र का प्रस्ताव क्यों पारित किया गया जबकि एक तरफ आप लोग अखंड भारत की बात करते है

    (6) 1942 में असहयोग आंदोलन का बहिष्कार करता है संघ ऐसा पत्र ब्रिटिश गवर्मेंट को क्यों लिखा अगर ये पत्र न लिखते तो देश 1942 में आज़ाद हो जाता

    (7) गांधी जी के हत्या के प्रयास संघ आज़ादी के पूर्व से कर रहा था क्यों ? गांधी जी पर आज़ादी के पूर्व 5 बार संघियों ने हमले किये क्यों

    (8) संघ प्रमुख केशव बलिराम हेडगांवकर ने कहा हे हिंदुओ को अपनी ताकत का उपयोग अंगेजो के खिलाफ न करते हुए देश में मुस्लिम क्रिश्चियन और दलितों के खिलाफ करना चाहीये ऐसा क्यों ?

    (9) कहते हे दो धार्मिक शक्तिया एक दूसरे के खिलाफ काम करती है तो देश टूटने की कगार पर होता है संघ और मुस्लिम लीग एक दूसरे के विपरीत थी इस कारण देश टुटा में संघ के लोगो से पूछना चाहता हूँ आप तो अखंड भारत की बात करते हो ऐसा क्यों हुआ

    (10) आरएसएस हिन्दू हित की बात करती है 1925 से 1947 के बीच ईसाई धर्मान्तरण के खिलाफ कोई आंदोलन क्यों नही चलाया ?

    (11) जब देश आज़ाद हुआ 15 अगस्त 1947 को संघ के लोग राष्ट्रध्वज तिरँगे को पेरो में कुचल रहे थे तिरँगा जला रहे थे क्यों ?

    (12) संघ के स्वयंसेवक अटल बिहारी बाजपाई ने क्रन्तिकारी लीलाधर बाजपई के खिलाफ क्यों गवाही दी जिससे उन्हें 2 वर्ष का कारावास हुआ

    (13) पिछड़ा दलित आदिवासी भी संघी हे तो नासिक के काला राम मंदिर में प्रवेश मुद्दे पर बाबा डॉ अम्बरेडकर जी ने आन्दोलन किया तो उस आन्दोलन का विरोध क्यों किया ?

    (14) संघ ने हिन्दू समाज के हित में किया कोई एक कार्य बताये जिससे हिन्दू समाज का निम्नवर्ग का तबका लाभान्वित हुआ हो

    (15) संघ के लोग अपने आप को राष्ट्रवादी समझते है 1925 से 1947 के बीच वन्देमातरम् का नारा क्यों नही लगाया अंग्रेजो का इतना डर था क्या

    (16) संघ / विहिप / और अन्य हिंदूवादी संघटन के प्रमुख दलित आदिवासी समूह से क्यों नही बने क्या ये हिन्दू नही है ?

LEAVE A REPLY