After Madras High Court sentences YouTuber to 6 months in jail, supporters trend #IstandWithSavukkuShankar

0

Supporters of Tamil Nadu YouTuber Savukku Shankar have trended #IstandWithSavukkuShankar after the Madras High Court sentenced him to six months in jail for contempt of court. Angry netizens have called the sentencing against the idea of free speech.

#IstandWithSavukkuShankar

A Bench comprising Justices GR Swaminathan and B Pugalenthi felt that Shankar had crossed the ‘Lakshman rekha’ by a long shot with his allegations of corruption against the judiciary. Both judges refused to show any leniency and sentenced the YouTuber to six-month jail sentence.

Angered by the court’s order, Shankar’s supporters took to Twitter to trend #IstandWithSavukkuShankar.

One wrote, “This is a country where people post and mourn for the Queen of England and don’t care about any local issues except films and cricket… #istandwithsavuku #IStandWithSavukku #IstandWithSavukkuShankar.”

Another commented, “Whistleblower to the core. We all stand with him at this time. We still have trust in our democracy!!!”

“He was a much needed whistleblower for TN. He is impervious to the ruling class and no one can curtail his speech. Bite the bullet for some days and come back stronger to bring more things to the limelight. @Veera284,” commented another user.

According to one user, “It’s appalling to see the judicial institutions having too little tolerance against a private citizen. Quite following Mr. Shankar for a while. Where the MSM or YTChannels take a right/left stand, @Veera284 takes a righteous stand most of the time. #IstandWithSavukkuShankar.”







The Madras High Court had taken a dim view of his comments against the judiciary and initiated a contempt of court case.

Also Read: What Did YouTuber Savukku Shankar Say In His YouTube Video Against Judiciary? Now Sentenced To 6-Month In Jail

Shankar had stood by his comments in his early reply filed before the court. He, however, contended that Justice Swaminathan could not be a part of the Bench in the case against him since the controversial remarks were made against him in the YouTube video. The YouTuber argued that the judge could not preside over a case where he himself was a party.

But the Madras High Court contended that the Registry and referred the case to Chief Justice and the latter had chosen to include Justice Swaminathan in the Bench.

Previous article“Habits never retire”: After Rafael Nadal, Sachin Tendulkar writes moving note after Roger Federer announces retirement
Next articleAAP MLA Amanatullah Khan arrested after raids by Delhi Anti Corruption Bureau; netizens question Arvind Kejriwal’s silence