Will Arun Jaitley’s passionate defence on Goa help Congress-JDS in Karnataka?


The Congress on Tuesday announced its support to the JDS to form the government in Karnataka after no single political party was able to secure a majority in the state. The BJP emerged as the single largest party with 104 seats, while the Congress ended up with 80 seats and the JDS-BSP combine won 38 seats.


Ghulam Nabi Azad of the Congress was quick to address the media to announce that his party had decided to support the JDS and even agreed for the latter to have its chief minister in the state. Moments later, both the outgoing chief minister, Siddaramaiah, and the JDS chief HD Kumaraswamy, met the governor to stake their claim to form the government in the state. The BJP’s BS Yeddyurappa too met the governor with his party colleagues including the Republic TV founder, Rajeev Chandrasekhar, and staked his claim to form a BJP-led government.

The governor has reportedly told them that he will consult constitutional experts before arriving at any decision.

The Congress sought to remind the governor that the party ought to be invited to form the next government since, together with the JDS, the party had 118 seats, more than the required 112 seats. The BJP, for its part, argued that it had the legitimate right to form the next government since it emerged as the single largest party.

The Congress reminded all how the BJP had begun changing the goalpost since it had successfully formed governments in Goa, Manipur and Meghalaya, despite Congress emerging as the single largest party in these states. In Goa, the saffron party had stitched an unlikely alliance with the Goa Forward Party despite the then ruling party faced the voters’ wrath last year. The BJP formed the government even in Manipur despite the Congress emerging as the single largest party. In Meghalaya, the saffron party formed the government despite winning just two of the 60 assembly seats.

Reacting to the Congress’s complaints on not respecting the people’s mandate, the then finance minister, Arun Jaitley, who’s also a noted Supreme Court lawyer, had made a passionate defence explaining why the governor was right to invite the combination with the majority support than the single largest party.

This is what he had written;

The Congress Party complains a bit too much. It accused the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of ‘stealing’ the mandate in Goa. It unsuccessfully petitioned before the Supreme Court. It attempted to raise issues in the Lok Sabha. What are the facts?

The assembly elections in Goa produced an inconclusive verdict. There was a hung assembly. Obviously in a hung assembly post-poll alliances will be formed. The BJP managed to form an alliance and presented to the Governor 21 out of 40 MLAs. 

They appeared before the Governor in person and submitted a letter of support. The Congress did not even submit a claim to the Governor. It had only the support of 17 MLAs. The Congress Party protested at the Governor’s decision to invite Mr Manohar Parrikar to form the Government with support of 21 out of 40 MLAs and described it as ‘a murder of democracy’.

In the face of claim of these 21 MLAs led by Mr Manohar Parrikar, the Governor could not have invited the minority of 17 MLAs to form the Government. There are several precedents which support this decision of the Governor.

• In 2005, BJP won 30 out of 81 seats in Jharkhand. The JMM leader Shri Shibu Soren with a support of 17 MLAs of his party plus others was invited to form the government .
• In J&K in 2002, the National Conference won 28 MLAs but the Governor invited the PDP & Congress combination of 15 + 21 MLAs to form the government.
• In 2013, the BJP won 31 seats in Delhi, but the AAP with 28 MLAs with support of Congress was invited to form the government.

There are other precedents on the same lines available in 1952 (Madras), 1967 (Rajasthan) and 1982 (Haryana).

The debate between the largest single party lacking majority versus a combination of parties constituting a majority was answered by the former President Shri KR Narayanan in his communiqué in March 1988 when he invited Shri Atal Behari Vajpayee to form the government.

The President had said “when no party or pre-election alliance of parties is in a clear majority, the Head of State has in India or elsewhere, given the first opportunity to the leader of the party or combination of parties that has won largest number of seats subject to the Prime Ministers so appointed obtaining majority support on the floor of the house within a stipulated time.

“This procedure is not, however, all time formula because situations can arise where MPs not belonging to the single largest party or combination can, as a collective entity, out-number the single largest claimant. The President’s choice of Prime Minister is pivoted on the would be Prime Minister’s claim of commanding majority support.”
The Governor in Goa had only one claim of 21 MLAs out of 40 elected MLAs with Shri Manohar Parrikar as their leader. The 17 MLAs of Congress did not even make a claim nor elected their leader. How could the Congress ever be invited to form the Government?

Although Jaitley is no longer a part of the government as he recuperates from his kidney transplant, the Congress would hope that the governor of Karnataka is guided by the arguments made by the former finance minister while deciding who to invite to form the government in the southern Indian state.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here