“This man does not consider us as freedom fighters but supari killers”


Today, 23 July, is the 111th birth anniversary of Chandra Shekhar Azad, one of the greatest leaders of the Indian freedom movement.

Azad led the Hindustan Socialist Republican Army (HSRA), India’s premier revolutionary, anti-Imperialist organisation. Earlier, when the organisation was called HRA, Ram Prasad Bismil was the chief.

Azad took over the leadership after Ram Prasad Bismil, Ashfaque Ullah, Roshan Singh, and Rajendra Lahiri, the leading lights of the HRA, were arrested. All four were hanged at different places. HRA’s spine was broken.

Yet, along with Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and Rajguru, Azad rebuilt the party as a socialist organisation committed to the overthrow of the British regime.

Despite being a leftist, Azad never gave up wearing the sacred religious thread (Janeu). Though born in Madhya Pradesh, Azad was a Kanyakubja Brahmin from Badarka, Unnao in Uttar Pradesh. He came from Awadh that produced Binda Tiwari, Mangal Pandey and several other freedom fighters.

The Awadhian Brahmin ethos carried both idol worshippers and iconoclasts, staunch defenders of the status quo and eloquent rebels. For Azad and many leftists from Awadh who came after him, there was no contradiction between feeling proud as a Sanatani Brahmin and following an ideology that believed in egalitarianism.

In fact, these figures interpreted the Brahmin ethic as one which believed in the primacy of merit over caste or religion based nepotism, fight for justice a divine duty, social responsibility as an intrinsic value, and tolerance/integration with other creeds a moral duty.

It is important to recall these attributes today, as forces belonging to a particular ideology are creating fake images of Chandra Shekhar Azad with Hindutva type ’tilak’ on his forehead.

Azad was a wrestler who exercised regularly while wearing his sacred thread (Janeu). But there is no picture of him with a ’tilak’ on his forehead. There is of course no issue in leftists sporting ’tilaks’ as its just that certain practices should not be imposed on historical figures.

Earlier, in the 1980s, Khalistanis tried appropriating Bhagat Singh as a mere Sikh hero. This, after Bhagat Singh openly announced his atheism in an article written before he became a martyr of India’s freedom struggle.

Attempts to appropriate Azad by Hindutva will also fail. More so because of Azad’s well documented revulsion towards RSS and Hindu Mahasabha.

Azad knew that Hedgewar, the RSS founder, an ex-HRA member, was a British informer. Bhagat Singh and Azad suspected Hedgewar to have informed on Ram Prasad Bismil and other HRA comrades.

HSRA leaders used to call RSS members ‘toady bachchas‘ or British hirelings.

To avenge the death of Lala Lajpat Rai, Azad and Bhagat planned and executed the political assassination of Lahore British officer Saunders together.

After Bhagat Singh’s arrest, Azad was raising money for his comrade’s defence. Author and litterateur Yashpal, who was part of the HSRA then, was sent by Azad to Savarkar.

Yashpal writes in his autobiography ‘Singhavalokan’ that Savarkar agreed to give Rs. 50,000 but on the condition that Azad and HSRA fighters stop fighting the British and assassinate Jinnah and other Muslims!

In his another book ‘Fighter for Freedom Writer for Justice,’ Yashpal wrote on page number 72, “He (Vinayak Savarkar’s elder brother also known as baba) did not refuse my request, but expressing his own viewpoint and purpose, he said, ‘Our aim is to free the country from servitude to foreigners. Progress towards our nationhood is the purpose of freeing the country– that must be assured……If you take the responsibility of finishing him (Jinnah) off then the greatest obstacle on the path of freedom will be removed. And, for that I can arrange for a payment of Rs 50,000.'”


On being told of Savarkar’s brother’s proposal, Azad cursed him and said: “This man does not consider us as freedom fighters but supari killers. He’s colluding with the British. Our fight is against the Britishers. Why would we kill Muslims? Tell him we don’t want his money.”

(Amaresh Misra is an author and views expressed here are his own. Janta Ka Reporter doesn’t necessarily endorse his views)

P.S. As rightly pointed out by many, as illustrated in Yashpal’s book, the Sarvarkar offering money to assassinate Jinnah wasn’t Vinayak Savarkar but his elder brother also known as baba. We’ve updated this opinion piece by Amaresh Misra Published three years ago, to avoid any confusion.


  1. I wonder why you call Vinayak Damodar Savarkar as VEER SAVARKAR while reporting his pro-British and anti-national stance which is not synonymous with veerta or bravery.

  2. This I had read about this in Jaspal’s autobiography. Once more this has been authenticated in this write-up. Right from the time Jana Sangh and RSS was formed their leaders like Golwaker, Savarkar etc were working as British pimps. It sis true they only snitched against Bismil Ashfaque Ullah, etc and got them arrested which lead to their hanging from gallows. Now a days they are trying to prove themselves as great patriots and lovers of their mother land. Yes, I do understand present generations shall not understand implications and effects of such betrayals. But those who still dabble in Indian freedom fights and history of those selfless hero’s who dared to stand up against British might with nothing else but sheer love and devotion to see a free India. Same time it is to understand what roll these betrayers of their mother land played in the name of religion, caste and creeds. It shames me to see present generations are supporting these betrayers, non secular nitwits who are trying to change our history and our 70-years old constitutions.

  3. This article deliberately and conveniently leaves out the fact that these words came from Babarao Savarkar and NOT Veer Savarkar. Yet in the article the author deliberately mentions only the surname “Savarkar” to mislead the reader. I wonder what other inaccuracies the article contains where the author has deliberately misrepresented facts.

    This is an article written solely to slam Hindutva ideology and Veer Savarkar. Useless and untrue article that deserves to be thrown in the trash.

  4. Janta Ka Reporter, claims Veer Savarkar offered Chandrasekhar Azad money to stop fighting the British. It quote Yashpal’s autobiography as a source. Did Yashpal really say that. Is it true??

    ✓-The answer is NO it was not Vinayak Damodar Savarkar.

    ✓-Yashpal indeed said Savarkar offered Azad Money, but the Savarkar in question was not Veer Savarkar, as janatakareport have fraudulently claimed.

    ✓-It was Baburao Savarkar, also known as Baba Savarkar, elder brother of Veer Savarkar.

    ✓-Did Yashpal claim Babarao Savarkar offered Azad money to stop fighting British?
    NO, Yashpal claims Savarkar offered Azad money to assasinate Jinnah.Nothing about “stop fighting British” is mentioned.

    ✓-Yashpal was a communist. Most of allegations he made against Babarao Savarkar are been totally false. He is not a primary source. He wrote the book after both Babarao and Azad died. Nobody else was there to verify. These allegations are corroborated by no other source.

    ✓-And above all, even if all statements of Yashpal were true (very unlikely), these fact checkers are still wrong. There was no “Veer Savarkar” anywhere in the picture. There was no “British agent” angle and no “stop fighting British” request. A textbook case of how these “factcheckers” operate

    • Thank you for the feedback. But, this was a blog by Amaresh Mishra not a report by us. We’ve clearly stated that views expressed here by the author’s own. You can write a counter piece as a blog.Best wishes

    • Savarkar was nevver veer, he was fattu chutiya, who licked ass of Britishers just to receive better treatment in jail


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here