Modi responsible for lynch-mob mentality: New York Times on JNU controversy


An editorial published in New York Times has few hours ago has criticised Narendra Modi government for crushing dissent in the country.

While commenting on the recent police crackdown and the subsequent assaults by BJP supporters on the student leader Kanhaiya Kumar and journalists, the paper said, “India is in the throes of a violent clash between advocates of freedom of speech and the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and its political allies on the Hindu right determined to silence dissent.

“This confrontation raises serious concerns about Mr. Modi’s governance and may further stall any progress in Parliament on economic reforms.”

It further added, “The crisis began with the arrest of Kanhaiya Kumar, the president of Jawaharlal Nehru University’s student union, by the Delhi police on charges of sedition. Mr. Kumar’s arrest followed an on-campus rally on Feb. 9 that marked the anniversary of the 2013 hanging of Muhammad Afzal, who was convicted of participating in the 2001 terrorist attack by an Islamist group based in Pakistan on India’s Parliament. The circumstances of Muhammad Afzal’s trial and execution remain controversial.”

The editorial further blamed Prime Minister Narendra Modi for singling out Kanhaiya for the violent treatment through his Delhi police.

It said, “The Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, a student group affiliated with Mr. Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party, and new university leadership appointed by Mr. Modi’s government were involved in calling the police on campus and singling out Mr. Kumar.

“The court in New Delhi where Mr. Kumar’s hearing took place last week was a scene of chaos, as lawyers and B.J.P. supporters chanting “glory to Mother India” and “traitors leave India” assaulted journalists and students. The police refused to intervene. A B.J.P. member of India’s legislative assembly, Om Prakash Sharma, who was recorded on camera severely beating a student, said later, “There is nothing wrong in beating up or even killing someone shouting slogans in favor of Pakistan,” as some students were accused of doing.”

The paper went further with its scathing criticism and blamed Modi for ‘lynch-mob mentality.’

It said, “Responsibility for this lynch-mob mentality lies squarely with Mr. Modi’s government. On the day after Mr. Kumar’s arrest, Home Minister Rajnath Singh said, “If anyone raises anti-India slogans and tries to raise question on the nation’s unity and integrity, they will not be spared.” India’s Supreme Court has limited the definition of India’s colonial-era crime of sedition to speech that is “incitement to imminent lawless action.” Mr. Singh apparently does not realize that, in a democracy, voicing dissent is a vital right, not a crime.”

It concluded that journalists have been right to express their outrage over the Patialia House Court incident asking Modi to rein in the violent elements within his party.

“Meanwhile, hundreds of journalists marched last week in protest from the Press Club of India to the Supreme Court in New Delhi. Thousands of students and faculty at universities across India have turned out to protest in recent days. These Indian citizens are right to voice their outrage at government threats to the exercise of their democratic rights.

“Mr. Modi must rein in his ministers and his party, and defuse the current crisis, or risk sabotaging both economic progress and India’s democracy. The charge of sedition against Mr. Kumar should be dropped. As Pratap Bhanu Mehta, president of the Center for Policy Research in New Delhi, warned in a recent opinion piece, members of Mr. Modi’s government ‘have threatened democracy; that is the most anti-national of all acts,'” the NYT editorial concluded.


  1. The current government must realize that they are governing a nation of Indians and some of them may not be willing to accept their views whether it is on economy or on social justice. Congress in the past tried to do it with Emergency and paid the price especially because there was no feedback from the social media. The social media today is telling the government to change its way before it is too late.

  2. It is a stupid editorial, based on malicious,false reports given to NYT by the hate-mongers comprising Leftists,islamists and crosstians,including disgruntled,corrupt NGOs/vested interests ,who are funding disruptive activities in many parts of India!I wish NYT had written an editorial based on first-hand information!