Supreme Court sets aside Gujarat High Court order in excise duty evasion case against Reliance

0

Mukesh Ambani owned Reliance Industries Ltd will now face a fresh trial in a three- decade old case relating to alleged evasion of excise duty after the Supreme Court set aside the October 2015 order of the Gujarat High Court.

reliance

The Gujarat High Court in 2015 had exonerated the company saying that since one of the provisions of Central Excise Rules, 1944, was omitted in 1994 without prescribing any saving clause, the proceedings cannot continue.

A bench comprising Justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and U U Lalit said “the charge against the respondent (Reliance Industries Ltd) is of evasion of duty. The ingredient of the offence is the evasion”.

Also Read:  On banning Pakistani actors, Mukesh Ambani says 'nation should come first and not arts and culture'

“The omission of a procedural rule for availing the credit cannot in any manner affect the said charge. The prosecution cannot be deprived of the opportunity to prove evasion which by itself is an offence,” the bench was quoted by PTI.

The bench said that there was no justification for the high court to quash the charge merely on the ground that a rule have been omitted.

Also Read:  Bounty on Mamata's head: Lok Sabha condemn BJP leader's threats

The apex court, through its order, has restored the order of the trial court, which had in March 2013 framed charges against the company for alleged offences under provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 read with provisions of Central Excise Rules.

A complaint was filed against the company on August 4, 1987, by the then Superintendent of Central Excise department in Ahmedabad alleging evasion of excise duty.

Also Read:  Reliance Jio accuses incumbent players of rejecting MNP requests

Following the complaint, the trial court had summoned the company. Later, a provision of the Central Excise Rule was omitted by the government by a notification on May 20, 1994.

Thereafter, the company sought discharge in the case but its application was rejected by the trial court which framed charges against it.

The company had challenged the order before the high court which allowed its plea and set aside the trial court order.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here