Angry Supreme Court slams Modi govt, says ‘Don’t force us to pass orders’


An angry Supreme Court on Friday slammed the Narendra Modi government accusing it of “sitting over” judges’ appointments. In an unusually harsh tone, the apex court warned, “Don’t force us to pass orders to remove this logjam.”

A three-judge bench led by the Chief Justice of India, Justice TS Thakur, told the government that since February, 75 names had been recommended as high court judges but none had been approved.

Photo:India Today

“The collegium has cleared 75 names of high court judges (for transfer/ appointment) but they have not been approved. I don’t know why, where these files are stuck,” a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur said while hearing a PIL on the issue.

“Why there is mistrust? Judges who have been transferred by the collegium have not been transferred. We don’t want all this,” the bench also comprising justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud said.

“I will take it up at the highest level and will come back to the court,” Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi told the bench and pleaded that no notice be issued for the time being on the PIL filed by 1971 war veteran Lieutenant Colonel Anil Kabotra on the issue.

According to a report by NDTV, Justice Thakur told the government: “You can’t leave a situation where courts are allowed to be shut down. Accessibility to courts can’t be allowed to come to a grinding halt. Tell us where the files are. There has to be some accountability. If you have any problems with the names, send it back. Collegium can consider. You can’t sit over files and not process the recommendations.”

During the brief hearing, the bench referred to the rising vacancies of judges in the high courts and the increasing number of pending cases.

“The vacancy in high courts has risen to 43 per cent and there are four million cases in the high courts. The whole system is collapsing,” the bench said.

(With PTI inputs)


  1. AS among ” WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA ”

    I am at a loss to understand – Why the system is allowed to enjoy by the Mafias who are ruling through the Print Media ?

    I have lost the faith in this system when I had to witness the misuse in W.P.- 415 / 2001 & W.P. 4400 / 2004 , here at Nagpur bench of Bombay H.C. .The socking moments were the promotion of GP’S to the post of ” Justice ” of the same court for not contesting the Govt. Orders which were the findings & acting as a trial court, just to benefit the offenders who happens to be with White Collard , holding position in the society .

  2. See the cunning plan of this media…instead of naming it as “Central Government”, they are using “Narendra Modi Government”, as if Government is a personal property of Narendra Modi. This is nothing but cunning #AAPtard’s mouthpiece i.e. Janta Ka Reporter’s gameplay of defaming Narendra Modi personally. Thank God, people now are aware of this dirty warfare of politicians and value media accordingly.

  3. Request Chief Justice Shri Thakur to first please see that Attorney General Mukul Rohtagi is immediately AND very urgently asked to leave the chair or suspend him immediately from Attorney General as well as Senior Advocate of Supreme Court then there are chances to run HonourableSupreme Court Honestly and Truly

  4. Federal Judicial Nomination Process

    Learn the basics about federal judicial nominations and why the individuals charged with dispensing justice in our society have a direct impact on civil rights and other protections for all.

    The Judicial Nomination Process

    When there is an open judicial position, the president nominates someone to the position. Usually he discusses the nomination with key senators before announcing his choice.
    The nomination is sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
    The Judiciary Committee collects information about the nominee, including a background check by the FBI, and reviews the nominee’s record and qualifications.
    The Judiciary Committee holds a hearing on the nominee. Witnesses speak both in favor and against the nomination. Senators ask questions of the nominee.
    The Judiciary Committee votes on the nomination, and then makes a recommendation to the full Senate, that the nominee either be confirmed, rejected, or that they do not have a recommendation. Sometimes they decline to send a nominee to the Senate at all.
    The full Senate debates the nomination.
    A vote of 3/5 of the Senate (60 senators) is required to end debate. This is called a cloture vote. If enough senators wish to delay a vote on a nominee, they can filibuster by not voting to end debate.
    When debate ends, the Senate votes on the nomination. Confirmation requires a simple majority of the senators present and voting

  5. I think u r not janta ka reporter but I found u to be anti bjp reporter. Never read a single story about bjp or modi stating their good policies or decisions. I hope they have taken at least 5 good decisions about policy making & prompt reaction & help offered to many helpless individuals which I haven’t observed before 2014. But u always put bjp & modi in poor light. Hope some good deeds gets appreciation from u. Highlight some good & positive things also. Don’t be biased.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here